When is someone going to post the content of the email that was sent to
donors after the last show?




UPDATE


The email is available at http://noagendaforums.com/index.php?topic=1754.0


Dear Producer,

We'd like to thank you for your past support and continued support of
the No Agenda Show. There is no way we could continue our efforts if it
wasn't for your direct support and we cannot thank you enough.


In 2010 we intend to make the show even better with new ideas and new
distribution by purchasing air time for our show. And we need to remain
commercial-free. While people have mixed feelings about being
commercial free, we believe it is the most efficient use of your time.
Why should you slog through endless messages?


But this does require continued support. With that in mind we are going
to need money to buy time and money to support and promote the show and
the stream.


For regular contributors we are offering the title of Founding Producer
and Founding Executive Producer for this year's rollout of a complete
and fully programmed Internet radio initiative called the No Agenda
Stream. This will be 24/7 programming at www.noagendastream.com .
It can be tuned in just like a radio station simply by typing in the
URL.


In the future, when all cars will be equipped with mobile Internet
connections we want to be the top alternative programming available for
drive-time audio enjoyment. We welcome any suggestions for programming
on this channel. Along with our volunteers we will be adding shows in
the months ahead. We will then begin work on promoting the station.


This is your opportunity to be a founding producer by going to http://dvorak.org/nas
and helping us make the important changes we need to make in the months
ahead. You need to be a part of this.


These changes include buying air time to increase our overall
effectiveness and increase our audience. The funds will also be used
for promotion and other activities as well as helping us decide what is
needed for the development of a third show.


We need your help! And as a bonus all founding producers will be listed
on a permanent web page to be used as a future reference. When Internet
radio streams become popular and commonplace you can point to the list
and show someone that you were a pioneer in this great societal change.
Become a founder!


This is a special and exclusive opportunity that will not be offered to
anyone except past contributors. The founding producers will be exactly
that %u2013 founders. Once the founders are set in stone, no new ones will
be added. On March 1, the offering is closed. And the founders list
will be final.


We are also offering the option to remain anonymous for those of you
who want to help us but would rather not be publicized.


Please help us out in our efforts to get real news and analysis to the
broader audience and keep us on the air for as long as possible and
become a founding producer of the No Agenda Stream. Be a part of
Internet history. Go to http://dvorak.org/nas
and get credit for being part of history. You won't regret it and we'll
be forever grateful. Be more than a listener. Be part of the team. Help
us now.


Thanks,

John & Adam

i could keep them going. but who cares you love her. this girl you praise is a right wing nut. and loves bsing.

i could keep going but whats the point you love her and she's the same old republican right wing nut. Also they only have tea bagers at these places

Adam you crazy dog. look man love what you have to say.. but Palin is full of sht. sh has no clue and brain dead.

come on, Dvorak should not be so negative about Sarah Palin. The reality is that comrade O betrayed many Americans (and many allies of America) and many would vote for Palin. For Gods' sake I would vote for her over comrade O.



--
Comic Strip Blogger .

Also, if Stevia - John's right, it tastes like utter crap and makes everything it touches taste like utter crap - is intended to damage male reproductive capacity, it wouldn't be the first push for that. Vegetarianism is suspect in the same way. Banning meat has long been a tool of cults - cut the recruit back to a pure carbohydrate diet, and the protein-starved body starts cannibalizing protein from its own muscles, starting with the brain, deteriorating cognitive function and creating complacent little followers with limited capacity for critical thought, a quality cult leaders find awfully convenient - but for sexual functions, banning meat has nasty repercussions as well. Plants are estrogen based, making an exclusive diet of them, and balancing vegetable proteins, etc., great for women, but estrogen-heavy diets aren't good for men at all. Among other things, suitable levels of testosterone are necessary for sperm production and sexual function in men, making meat a pretty valuable commodity in the male diet. Obviously there's such a thing as overdoing it, and cutting out vegetables altogether is pretty stupid, but within moderation men should eat lean meat. Vegetarians like to vehemently point out that meat is murder (and spiritually uncool) but vegetarianism is murder too (last I heard, plants were also living things, if you're going to get spiritual about it) and for men it's also suicide. (As long as I'm on the subject, a pet peeve: how come if a vegetarian comes to your house to eat a meal they think it's cool to grouse about what the host has made and demand a special vegetarian meal for themselves, but if you go over to their house to eat they never for a second think they should make you a meal with meat in it?)

Adam, your FRINGE clip kind of missed the context of the "earthquakes caused by global warming" comment. The kneejerk comment, in context, was very much mocking global warming, and the earthquake IS effectively caused by an earthquake machine. (That's not precisely the mechanism but it's manmade.) A regular theme of FRINGE has been that whatever official version you're told, it's a lie, so I'd think the show would be right up your alley.

Love the show, but I have noticed a nasty tendency on your part to snatch bits of things away from their context, particularly from fiction, and conclude they say the opposite of what they're saying. When a woman on a TV show says, oh, these earthquakes are just a byproduct of global warming and then they turn out to be caused by clandestine supertechnology, do you think the intended audience reaction is to nod sagely and accept that global warming is causing unusual disasters or that the woman who said that is a real idiot? I'm guessing the latter. In the context of the show, it's a good joke and that's it.

Listen to NA 172 PreShow Chat

Also added today:
NA 167 PreShow Chat
NA 169 PreShow Chat
NA 171 PreShow Chat